Prediction of Eric Jelen vs Christoph Zipf Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Jelen vs C. Zipf

Eric Jelen

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

138

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Christoph Zipf

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

138

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Jelen 1 - 0 Zipf

They have played 3 sets in total, with Eric Jelen winning 2 and Christoph Zipf winning 1. The last match between Eric Jelen and Christoph Zipf was at the Travemunde CH, 02-07-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Eric Jelen getting the victory 7-6 5-7 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jelen	1
Zipf	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Travemunde CH(07-02-84)

Stats

Eric Jelen

Christoph Zipf

E. Jelen vs C. Zipf H2H Profile

E. Jelen	Stats	C. Zipf
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.20% (166-152)	Career Total W/L	37.04% (30-51)
1	Clay	0
3	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. Jelen vs C. Zipf Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eric Jelen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Christoph Zipf has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eric Jelen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Christoph Zipf has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Eric Jelen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Christoph Zipf has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Eric Jelen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Christoph Zipf winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Eric Jelen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 33/19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Christoph Zipf has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/12).
Player level: In the last year, Eric Jelen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Christoph Zipf has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eric Jelen winning 1 times and Christoph Zipf being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Eric Jelen winning 2 and Christoph Zipf winning 1.
The last match between Eric Jelen and Christoph Zipf was at the Travemunde CH, 02-07-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Eric Jelen getting the victory 7-6 5-7 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eric Jelen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Christoph Zipf has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eric Jelen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Christoph Zipf has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Eric Jelen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Christoph Zipf has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Eric Jelen vs Christoph Zipf Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Jelen vs C. Zipf H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Jelen	Stats	C. Zipf
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
19	Games Won	19
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Jelen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Moscow - 04-11-1991
R1 Jan SiemerinkJ. Siemerink	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Vienna - 14-10-1991
R1 Gerald MandlG. Mandl	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R2 Anders JarrydA. Jarryd	L	7-6(5) 6-3	Stats
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Jan SiemerinkJ. Siemerink	L	7-5 7-6(8)	Stats
U.S. Open - 26-08-1991
R1 Paul HaarhuisP. Haarhuis	L	2-6 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Zipf Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bloemfontein CH - 23-11-1987
R2 Byron TalbotB. Talbot	L	4-6 7-6 6-3	Stats
Waiblingen CH - 11-05-1987
R3 Ivo WernerI. Werner	L	6-2 3-6 6-2	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 13-10-1986
R2 Matt AngerM. Anger	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Dortmund CH - 10-06-1985
R2 Axel KriegA. Krieg	W	6-7 7-6 6-2	Stats
R3 Markus GauM. Gau	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

E. Jelen vs C. Zipf Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Jelen	Stats	C. Zipf
52.20% (166/152)	YTD Win/Loss	37.04% (30/51)
50.43% (412/405)	Sets Win/Loss	41.54% (81/114)
49.35% (3823/3923)	Games Win/Loss	46.87% (892/1011)
48.57% (34/36)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (6/12)
42.00% (42/58)	Clay Win/Loss	36.54% (19/33)
59.38% (57/39)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.44% (4/5)
63.46% (33/19)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
254.45	Average Opponent Rank	581.65
41.67% (15/21)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
38.46% (5/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
70.00% (7/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
50.96% (106/102)	Main Tour W/L	34.88% (15/28)
66.00% (33/17)	Challenger W/L	39.47% (15/23)
54% (144/269)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	36% (29/80)
44% (20/45)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
47% (8/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
60% (68/113)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (12/34)
78% (155/121)	1st Set Won, Won Match	63% (32/20)
21% (155/33)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	38% (32/12)
27% (162/44)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (49/10)